In psychology, the principal reason for retraction was data fabrication. Retractions took longer to make, and generally were from higher ranked and more prestigious journals, than in the two cognate disciplines. We recommend that journal editors should be more forthcoming in the reasons they provide for article retractions.

Dec 29, 2018 According to Retraction Watch, this isn't the first retraction for Fahim Ullah by the author of a popular health book and a psychology professor.

Ecological Psychology. on records of articles retracted due to fraud (fabrication of data) in the Retraction Watch public database. 25 feb. 2021 — Retractions i akademisk publicering - Retractions in academic publishing Retraction Watch tillhandahåller uppdateringar om nya retraktioner och Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin och Biological Psychiatry . av C Liu · 2019 · Citerat av 7 — The user-dependent methods either use wearable devices (e.g., pendant, watch, clip, bracelet, or ring) to track rapid changes in its orientation or rely on users 6 aug.

View the full class here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVHY3HvnI6yMIotukmARTlrCk2q8RXCHg Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. A Retraction Watch post, in which the former COPE Chair, Virginia Barbour (2012-2017), made a claim of apparent harassment, is the most striking example of the dangers when collaboration may take Psychology journal retracts two articles for being“unethical, scientifically flawed, and based on racist ideas and agenda 21 days Retraction Watch. Read [From the Retraction Watch website] “In January 2014, Psychological Science began rewarding digital badges to authors who committed to open science practices such as sharing data and materials. A study published today in PLOS Biology looks at whether publicizing such behavior helps encourage others to… – Retraction Watch (blog) May 26, 2017 student Researchers have retracted a 2016 paper after discovering that they accidentally administered three times the reported dose of anesthesia to rats.

I just got the film on Blu Ray and wanted to check the quality. Well, I got sucked 2 Hotspot 2 wheatgrowers 2 anti-dilution 2 nervously-watched 2 parochialism 2 6 idol 6 councillor 6 libero 6 psychologist 6 Patriarch 6 boxer 6 right-winger 6 52 spead 52 demonstation 52 quandaries 52 retractions 52 indoctrination 52 28 dec. 2007 — a visual artists writings on art, life, politics, love, ethics, psychology, pets, environment, so watch out!

Retractionwatch.com Website Analysis (Review) Retractionwatch.com has 6,572 daily visitors and has the potential to earn up to 789 USD per month by showing ads. See traffic statistics for more information.. Hosted on IP address 162.144.153.196 in Provo, United States. You can find similar websites and websites using the same design template.. Retractionwatch.com has an estimated worth …

The blog was launched in August 2010 and is produced by science writers Ivan Oransky (Vice President, Editorial Medscape) and Adam Marcus (editor of Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News). Its parent organization is the Center for Scientific Integrity Psychology journal retracts two articles for being“unethical, scientifically flawed, and based on racist ideas and agenda 20 days Retraction Watch.

Retraction Watch. 34,853 likes · 375 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Since some of you might be interested in what I've documented about other published articles from Zhang's lab, your best bet is … Retraction Watch. 34,802 likes · 678 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process 2021-01-11 2017-12-18 Retractionwatch.com Website Analysis (Review) Retractionwatch.com has 6,572 daily visitors and has the potential to earn up to 789 USD per month by showing ads. See traffic statistics for more information..

[From the Retraction Watch website] “In January 2014, Psychological Science began rewarding digital badges to authors who committed to open science practices such as sharing data and materials. A study published today in PLOS Biology looks at whether publicizing such behavior helps encourage others to… The above-linked Retraction Watch article quotes the former editor of the journal as saying that the current editor “is working on how best to respond to criticisms” of that paper. I’m not sure why they need to respond, now that the paper has been retracted. A brief summary focusing on whether some of psychology's research practices (e.g., “p-hacking”, undervaluing replication, failing to publish null results) undermine the validity of its findings, with an emphasis on how they might affect students and early career researchers. Dec 18, 2017 UNSPLASH, GARY CHAN W hen it comes to retractions, we at Retraction Watch always have a lot to say. Especially after spending much of 2017 building our retraction database, which now holds just shy of 16,000 entries—more than 1,000 from 2017 alone. That’s an increase from the 650 total retractions counted by MEDLINE in 2016.
Quote is

Vi skulle vilja visa dig en beskrivning här men webbplatsen du tittar på tillåter inte detta. A Retraction Watch post, in which the former COPE Chair, Virginia Barbour (2012-2017), made a claim of apparent harassment, is the most striking example of the dangers when collaboration may take [From the Retraction Watch website] “In January 2014, Psychological Science began rewarding digital badges to authors who committed to open science practices such as sharing data and materials.

The increase in retraction rates is quite obvious.
Princip redovisning.se

Jun 25, 2012 Here's Ivan Oransky, writing in Retraction Watch: “According to an Erasmus press release, a scientific integrity committee found that the results

Among the latest retractions is research suggesting that watching Nov 24, 2015 Retraction Watch, which has reported on thousands of retractions and been of The Center For Scientific Integrity and Co-Founder of Retraction Watch, ONE and COS Call for Transparent Studies in Cognitive Psychology Apr 9, 2014 Frontiers editorial director Costanza Zucca has told Retraction Watch their consent to a public psychological diagnosis in a scientific study. Aug 26, 2019 Below, Retraction Watch reports a former postdoc falsified data for 59 qRT-PCR experiments involved with cancer research. 59 experiments. In Retraction Watch recently ran a story about the recent retraction of “Unlocking past and happiness,” by William Hart published in Psychological Science in 2013. Oct 16, 2012 The percentage of scientific articles retracted because of fraud has from the Office of Research Integrity, Retraction Watch, news media, and Jan 18, 2017 a psychologist at the University of Virginia, in Charlottesville, who runs the Center for Open Science. (Full disclosure: Retraction Watch, which Mar 6, 2018 For example, in an interview with Retractionwatch.com, one (2010).

A brief summary focusing on whether some of psychology's research practices (e.g., “p-hacking”, undervaluing replication, failing to publish null results) undermine the validity of its findings, with an emphasis on how they might affect students and early career researchers.

PubMed represents the biomedical literature. [From the Retraction Watch website] “In January 2014, Psychological Science began rewarding digital badges to authors who committed to open science practices such as sharing data and materials. A study published today in PLOS Biology looks at whether publicizing such behavior helps encourage others to… A retraction does not always signal scientific misbehavior.

The tenth year of Retraction Watch’s existence included—as is often the case—a new record, some impressive numbers, and some bizarre stories. But it also included some exemplary behavior. Here are some of the year’s top retraction stories, in no particular order: 1.